During a meeting today with the Pará State Secretary of the  Environment, Valmir Gabriel Ortega, the State and Federal Public  Prosecutors Offices requested cancellation of the environmental  license granted to Alcoa to mine bauxite in the municipality of  Juruti. In an exclusive interview with the Amazonia website, the  coordinator of the State Public Prosecutors Office (MPE)  Environmental Center, Prosecutor Raimundo Moraes, explained that the  decision to request suspension aims at averting a violent reaction by  the local population, which wants the company to leave at any cost,  and also to conduct a rigorous review of the license.
Although mining operations are only scheduled to begin in 2008,  during public hearings held on May 2nd and 3rd, the community claims  that it is already suffering impacts from construction of lodgings  for employees of the multinational, a port and a road.
Moraes said, “the impacts are so obvious that Alcoa has not denied  any of them. Alcoa said it was correcting the problems and recognized  that it does not enjoy good relations with the community”. Moraes,  however, stated that the problems run deep and will not be set  straight with just repairs.Impacts One of the main complaints raised  at the hearings is contamination of the waters in rivers that flow  through the town.
Technical studies detected the presence of feces coliforms in Jará  Lake, which supplies water to the municipality, and data from the  municipal health department show that cases of viral hepatitis,  caused by ingesting water contaminated by human feces, jumped from 26  in 2006 to 121 in the first four months of this year. The community  accuses Alcoa of not performing proper treatment on sewage from the  lodging of its employees. Moreover, Incra representatives present at  the meetings presented pictures and other documents that prove that  the company is conducting deforestation in areas not authorized  inside the Juruti Velho and Socó Agro-extractivist Settlement Projects.
Another complaint is the increased expenses of public agencies, which  are faced with increased demands for health, education and  infrastructure. “If, after the review is conducted, Alcoa can act  correctly, alright, otherwise it would be best for them to leave, as  we do not need to bear these costs. It is unfair that they keep the  riches produced here and we keep the burdens”, says Moraes.
The prosecutor believes that the population has shown its lack of  trust in the company and accuses the multinational of trying to upset  the hearings. “They tried to co-opt leaders, offering 10 jobs to each  community”.
License
The preliminary license for installation of the Alcoa plant was  granted by the State Environmental Council (Coema) in 2005. At the  time, the representative of the State Public Prosecutors Office (MPE)  voted against the authorization. Soon afterward, the agency, together  with the Federal Public Prosecutors Office (MPF), filed a class  action suit petitioning for the suspension of the company’s  activities in the region.
The hearings this week were attended by the coordinator of the MPE  Environmental Center, Prosecutor Raimundo Moraes and Federal Attorney  Daniel César Azeredo Avelino, who commands the (Federal Public  Prosecutors Office (MPF) in Santarém. Members from both agencies also  visited the affected locations.
By Renata Gaspar
Link: http://www.amazonia.org.br